Mice and Men Compare and Contrast Essay Example

Mice and Men Compare and Contrast Paper Many movies are derived from novels, and all of them have major differences from the book version. While there are many similarities in the movie and the book Of Mice and Men, there are many differences also. Some differences are presented through the characters, scenes, and the way the actors play their roles. Sense wanted to get the story done within a time limit, so It was less detailed than the book. In Steinbeck novel, character image plays a crucial role In the story. Slim was considered the prince of the ranch, and was Important to the ranch. He was looked p to by the other ranch-hands, and was always asked for his advice on subjects they needed help on. Curly wifes Isolation was her motivation for being a flirt, because she did not know any other way to be, or how to start talking to another man other than her husband. The mall difference Is that Gary Senses story starts out backwards and Is told through flashbacks. The setting In the novel Is only different In where the bunkhouse Is described. Crooks played an average sasss semi bondage Negro in the movie. The plot was largely differentiated in each media. We will write a custom essay sample on Mice and Men Compare and Contrast specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Mice and Men Compare and Contrast specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Mice and Men Compare and Contrast specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer The most important one, however, was in the end where George killed Leonie. The bunkhouse wasnt a very material area; it was just described through the light it contained. She was considered off limits to everyone, and was known as Curlers property. His character was displayed through his room rather than his actions and name like in the novel. The settings in the movie Of Mice and Men were almost identical to the settings that were described in the novel. The story was set in the united States near mountains and streams, ranch country. At the start of chapter 2 Steinbeck described the bunk house and in the movie it looks Just as he describes. The bunk house was a long rectangular building. Inside, the walls were whitewashed and the floor unpainted. In three walls there were small, square windows, and in the forth a solid door with a wooden latch. Against the wall were eight bunks, five of them made up with blackest and the other three showing their burlap ticking. Over each bunk there was a nailed an apple box with opening forward so that it made two shelves for the personal belongings of the occupant of the bunk Pig. 7 The interesting thing about the movie is the characters were always in the right setting when an event happened lust as described in the book. In the film when Leonie talks to Crooks the setting Is in Crooks room in the novel it is the same Crooks settled himself more comfortably on his bunk set down, he invited set down on the nail keg Pig. 70 In the film when George kills Hurlers wife it takes place In the barn while all the others are playing horseshoes outside in the novel It Is the same He pawed up the hay until It partly covered her . From outside the barn came a cry of men and the double clang of shoes on metal. Pig. 92. Not only are the characters In the right setting at the right time they are also well portrayed. In the movie version Of Mice and Men the characters are as I Imagined them In my head. Leonie was a character that was well portrayed. This Is the physical description of Leonie A huge man, shapeless of face, with large, pale eyes, with wide, sloping shoulders; and he walk heavily dragging his feet a little, the way a bear drags his paws. His arms did not swing at his side, but hung loosely pig. Leonie was also slow In ten nana; teeny menthol Tanat In ten story. Lend looked and acted the way I pictured him. Other characters were also portrayed very well, George, Lenses only friend is described as being small and quick, dark of face, with restless eyes and sharp, strong features. Every part of him was defined: small, small hands, slender arms, a thin and bony nose. Pig. 2 In the movie this physical description fits him well. All character descriptions fit the characters in the movie. The movie had many differences while still giving the same message that the book was portrayed to have. One of the major differences was that Candy never came into the room when Leonie and Crooks were talking to each other. This was major because Crooks never found out that the plan was true about the little house. In the book after he heard Candy talk about it he wanted to get in on the deal. Also the movie it never showed Leonie have his illusions of his Aunt Carla and the rabbits when he was waiting by the pond. The last major difference was that George never hesitated to shoot Leonie in the movie and in the book it was very hard for him. After George shot Leonie, Slim came to comfort George and take him out for a drink. The characters in the novel and the movie had many differences. In the book George was shown to hate Curler with a passion. In the movie George didnt seem to like Curler too much but he definitely didnt hate him like in the book. In the movie Curlers wife mimed to be attracted to Leonie and enjoyed his presence because he was nice. In the book she talked to him only because she was amused by Liens stupidity. Leonie was explained as a beast in the book and, his shoulders could fill the doorway. In the movie he was stronger and bigger than the others were but not to the extreme amount that the book portrayed him to be. Every other thing about Leonie was extremely as the book told it. * George and Leonie are shown sneaking into a train at night to escape from Weed. This was not mentioned in the book. * The bus is shown to be heading for Tyler Ranch which angers George as the bus driver old him and Leonie to get off the bus earlier on in the movie. * In the movie, Slim tells George to bring a mule with a sore foot to the barn.